ネタ | Perfectjammer道場 | 学問・研究 | まにあ道

The term "bombing drone" denotes an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) that is specifically utilized for carrying out drone strikes. These drones are part of a larger group of combat drones that are responsible for tasks such as target acquisition, surveillance, reconnaissance, and intelligence gathering.

While bomber drones are unmanned, they are not fully automated. Instead, they are typically operated by humans in real-time from a remote location.

Undoubtedly, there is a remarkable weight reduction in comparison to traditional aircraft, as the absence of a human pilot renders all their necessary provisions inconsequential.

Presented here is a concise glimpse into the world of stealth bombers and the methods employed to render these units inoperative.

Unraveling the Fallacy of Detecting Stealth Bomber Drones.

In a utopian realm, bomber drones would embody the genuine definition of stealth. As one can imagine, this necessitates completely eluding detection by targets. Any potential compromise could result in an unsuccessful termination of a mission in progress.

The US Air Force's RQ-170 is a prime instance of a compromise. In December 2011, an RQ-170 crashed on the border between Iran and Afghanistan, and the Iranians wasted no time in collecting the wreckage and commencing their own engineering of the technology.

The RQ-180's inception is credited not solely to the ability to replicate but also to the proficiency to enhance the original plan. These models are purposed to be inconspicuous espionage drones, but what does the notion of "stealth" signify in this particular case?

The general perception of drone stealth revolves around its effectiveness in evading radar detection. While satellites offer extensive visibility, their lack of operational flexibility partially contributes to the incorporation of detection avoidance features in certain designs.

The operation of radar technology is uncomplicated. It emits a signal that reflects off an aircraft, indicating its location and providing the ability to track it.

Nonetheless, this task becomes significantly more arduous when dealing with drones that have a smaller physical presence, thereby giving rise to the concept of their stealth capabilities.

The issue with this myth lies in its failure to consider the role of radio frequencies. Without a doubt, autonomous control relies on communication that is dependent on frequencies. However, it is crucial to understand that these frequencies can be interfered with using the appropriate technology.

Despite this, taking this route does come with a heightened level of difficulty in comparison to exclusively employing radar recognition for drone detection.

What equipment or tools are necessary to disable a drone that is designed for bombing missions?

Categorically, the equipment found in this vicinity falls into two groups: drone detection and drone disruption. The former pertains to the identification of drones, while the latter emphasizes the deactivation of the detected drones.

Four Cutting-Edge Technologies for Neutralizing Counter UAS Threats.

The utilization of drones may pose a risk to both human safety and security. Moreover, they are often utilized for espionage purposes, gathering sensitive information from secure locations like military bases, and can cause harm by transporting explosives.

The counter-drone technology industry has been rapidly evolving, with a particular focus on the military sector. If you want to know about the top four trending counter UAS technologies, read on.

Grids

This drone detection solution is frequently utilized by militaries to intercept drones. Once the net ensnares a drone, it promptly halts its movement, causing it to plummet to the ground. This effective approach ensures that a drone cannot return to its sender, thereby preventing the unauthorized dissemination of sensitive information from a military station or, in a worst-case scenario, mitigating the potential physical damage caused by any explosives it may be transporting.

Catching drones with nets has advantages, including a low risk of harm to the sender or others from explosions and the ability to track down and prosecute the sender. Ground-launched net cannons are highly precise and effective.

The reload time for drone deployed nets is a notable drawback. This implies that if there are multiple drones or if the target manages to evade capture initially, the threat remains unresolved.

Radar

By utilizing radio energy, radar is able to accurately determine the location of an object. Radars play a crucial role in measuring the direction and position of drones. Typically, radars emit a radio signal and subsequently analyze the echo it receives. However, they have limited effectiveness in detecting small targets. Originally, radars were primarily developed to track larger objects like passenger aircraft. Nonetheless, military forces also rely on radars to locate smaller drones that may be present in the surrounding area.

Radars play a crucial role in effectively monitoring expansive areas, providing precise location details, and identifying multiple targets concurrently. Given the imperative need for unwavering defense preparedness irrespective of unfavorable weather conditions, radars emerge as an exceptionally viable solution, even in instances of limited visibility like fog, darkness, and similar circumstances.

Shortcoming: The inability of most radars to differentiate between small drones and small flying animals like bats or birds is a drawback. This makes radars less effective for military purposes, as they may miss small-sized drones.

High Power Microwave (HPM)

The use of High Power Microwave devices can have a significant impact on drones. The HPM's electromagnetic waves can disrupt the radio links that control a drone's movements, causing it to malfunction or crash. Furthermore, the high voltage and currents of the HPM can cause damage to the drone's electronic systems, rendering it useless. This makes the HPM an effective tool for preventing dangerous situations involving drones.

Upsides: Productive in putting a stop to drones that are present within the HPM distance range.

Although this technology serves the purpose of safeguarding military bases and highly secured areas, it inadvertently poses a threat to other electronic devices, potentially leading to their accidental destruction. Additionally, HPM has the capability to disrupt communication signals.

GPS Spoofer

Thanks to this technological advancement, a signal is sent to the identified suspicious drone, causing it to be misinformed about its precise whereabouts. By continuously updating the GPS coordinates, the spoofer gains control over the drone, enabling its relocation to a designated "safe zone." Consequently, the presence of the drone is effectively eliminated, minimizing the potential risks involved.

Positive aspects: The cost-effectiveness of GPS spoofers makes them an attractive technology for armies, as they can be purchased in greater quantities and deployed across various geographical areas.

Negative aspect: Unfortunately, there is a drawback of possibly causing interference with other radio communication signals.

The system operator's assessment of the threat indicates that electronic means, specifically soft-kill measures like frequency drone jamming, can be employed to effectively mitigate the UAV threat.

The act of gps jamming entails the deliberate transmission of concentrated RF power towards the specific frequency channels utilized by the Drone for telemetric, control, and navigation purposes. The range at which the jamming signal remains effective depends on factors such as line of sight and power output, and it can extend to approximately 5Km or even further distances when employing high power output (>50W).