ネタ | Perfectjammer道場 | 学問・研究 | まにあ道

Online retailers and drone technology companies are marketing RF jammers as tools for deterring drones or ensuring privacy, bypassing federal laws that prohibit the sale of these devices in the United States.

Rf signal jamming device that interfere with communication systems, usually by sending competing radio signals to confuse nearby electronics. It's a decades-old technology that federal regulators have been trying to crack down on, but interest in jammers persists because people can use them to avoid unwanted drones, disable security cameras or block Wi-Fi networks.

A significant number of consumers are not interested in the product mainly due to its price. Major corporations and state government agencies are keeping a close eye on the growing use of drones in warfare in Ukraine and Israel, and are getting ready for potential drone terrorism within their borders.

There is a high demand for this technology among the public, yet some individuals are hesitant to embrace it out of fear that it may pose a risk to controlled airspace.

Various potential uses exist for jamming devices, including creating interference for unwanted drones, disrupting Wi-Fi networks, and deactivating doorbell cameras. In a Reddit thread specifically focused on Ring doorbell cameras, certain users voiced concerns regarding the utilization of jammers to disrupt the cameras while engaging in theft to evade detection. Interestingly, a Reddit user pointed out the irony that Amazon appears to benefit from both perspectives: Ring is a subsidiary of Amazon, and Amazon also facilitates the purchase of devices that could disable Ring's cameras.

Amazon chose not to address inquiries about tampering with Ring devices.

Jammers, also known as RF "blocking," are a commonly discussed subject on online forums that cater to individuals who hold the belief that they are being specifically targeted for extensive surveillance by the government or other entities. This belief or phenomenon is occasionally referred to as "gang stalking."

Within online forums dedicated to individuals who perceive themselves as targets of extensive surveillance by the government or other parties, jammers, also called RF "blocking," are a popular subject of discussion. This belief or phenomenon is occasionally labeled as "gang stalking."

Markets with potential for anti-drone blocker like RF jammers include large corporations and organizations that worry about drone terrorism but are not permitted by law to deploy jammers. In a communication to congressional leaders in the previous year, four major sports leagues, including the National Football League, implored Congress to grant permission for state and local law enforcement to utilize anti-drone technologies.

Prison administrators in certain states have indicated their intention to seek legal approval for the use of jammers, with the aim of preventing inmates from using cell phones.

Nonetheless, the current law confines the procurement and utilization of RF jammers to a narrow range of government agencies, which primarily include the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Departments of Energy and Defense.

Companies specializing in drone countermeasures tend to concentrate on clientele from abroad.

IXI Electronic Warfare, a drone defense company, issues a warning on its website regarding the potential risks posed by drones to stadiums, prisons, and airports. They assert their ability to promptly neutralize these threats, employing radio-frequency jammers referred to as Dronekillers. However, it is important to note that stadium operators, prison authorities, and airport officials in the United States lack the legal authority to acquire such products.

According to an email statement, the California-based company acknowledged that their main emphasis is on international endeavors, attributing this to the more permissive regulatory environment abroad. They also specified that their sales services within the United States are exclusively reserved for authorized federal agencies.

Concerns have been raised by some experts in counter-drone countermeasures regarding the possibility of these devices spreading in the United States.